oh dear... I can't hold it in any longer. I try to avoid talking politics in public because I have a lot of friends on both sides and about half of them might not like me anymore after reading this.
In general I don't like radicalism. The far religious right with their creationism in public schools, anti-abortion, anti-queer, anti-science outlook incites the same level of rage in me as the far left that think it's the government's job to ensure the same level of comfort and luxury to everyone no matter how hard they work or how valuable their skills. The far right wants to legislate morality, the far left wants to use my hard earned money to pay someone else's bills.
Barack Obama is about as far left as left gets. John McCain is a moderate Republican. Can you see where I'm going here? Is it clear who I'm planning to vote for?
Here's why I fear Obama:
- Health care: Obama has said outright that he believes that health care is a RIGHT. Health care is NOT a right. It is a service provided by highly trained and highly skilled individuals that deserve to be well compensated for their work. You may not agree with me here but nationalizing health care will shred our world class medical system.
- Ayers: Obama says he was only 8 yrs old when Bill Ayers was blowing things up. Obama says he was just a neighbor. But Ayers hosted the party when Obama launched his political career. Obama and Ayers worked together on an education project in Chicago. Ayers is a radical leftist with a history of violence and even if they aren't buddies, he and Obama are definitely running in the same circles. And the "I didn't know" defense doesn't work here either. As a politician you really should know who you're associating with.
- Rev. Jeremiah Wright: Obama's own pastor, his teacher in spiritual and moral matters, is a scary scary man. He preaches anti-Americanism and spews hatred from the pulpit. I really don't understand how Obama weaseled away from this one. Even the media, so clearly in love with Obama, thinks that Wright is wrong. How can everyone simply shrug this off?
- Acorn: Obama was their lawyer. Maybe it's not a huge conspiracy. Maybe the folks that run Acorn are just too stupid to teach their canvassers that registering false voters is against the law. And that's not the only scary thing Acorn has done. They also strong armed banks into giving home loans to low income folks, most of whom couldn't actually afford to make the payments. Now the entire world economy is suffering in part because of such loans.
- Citizenship controversy: Phillip J. Berg, a lawyer and a Democrat, has filed a lawsuit against Obama asking Obama to produce proof that he's a natural born US citizen (a constitutional requirement for the presidency). Obama has yet to produce more than a short form copy of his birth certificate and the short form will not hold up in a court of law. Obama was apparently born in Hawaii (though his grandmother claims to have been present at his birth in Kenya). Even if he was born in the US, there's evidence that he had forsaken his US citizenship so he could attend school when he lived with hist stepfather in Indonesia. In order to attend school in Indonesia at that time you had to be a citizen of Indonesia and neither Indonesia nor the US allow for dual citizenship. His school paperwork claimed he was a citizen of Indonesia. That would mean he returned to the US through immigration and is now a naturalized citizen (NOT a natural born citizen) or an illegal alien. Berg's website all about the lawsuit is here. Maybe it's all a big conspiracy theory. If it is, why in the world won't Obama just get a legal copy of his birth certificate and render the whole thing moot?!?
Obama has me shaking in my boots. He associates with some people and organizations that are downright frightening. Buster noted something rather astonishing while we watched Obama on TV the other day. Obama delivers eloquent oratory. He has the ability to inspire an audience and make people want to agree with him and believe in him no matter what he's saying. Buster said it reminded him of Hitler. I was initially shocked by the comparison but I had to agree. Obama's charisma has carried him past the controversy with Wright and it seems to be floating him by Ayers and Acorn as well.
Now, I believe people can change over time. Once upon a time I was a practicing Lutheran. Later, in college, I became an atheist Objectivist Libertarian. Now I'm an agnostic independent. But I do find that my past informs my present. I still have libertarian leanings and I still rely on a personal moral code taught to me by my parents and reinforced by my childhood church.
Obama is trying to sweep his past under a rug. He's trying to tell us all that Ayers and Acorn and Write are all "distractions". Perhaps. But perhaps his past informs his present. How could it not? At the very beginning of his political career he associated with a man so far to the political left that he was willing to bomb buildings and homes to make his point. Obama was a lawyer for a far left organization with a sketchy past and fraudulent present. And Sunday after Sunday Obama sat in a pew and listened to his spiritual leader preach anti-American sentiment, hatred, and reverse racism. And he seems reluctant to produce documentation to prove that he's constitutionally eligible to hold the office of president. Could that mean he's willing to bypass the constitution to get what he wants? How can all this be irrelevant?
Here's what I really think: Obama is so far to the left of left that you might as well call him a radical socialist. And that, all by itself, is enough to make me run screaming.
McCain is not perfect. I don't agree with his stance on abortion but I know he can't really do anything about it so I figure that one is a non-issue. What I know of his health care plan sounds sketchy if not worthless, but at least he's not trying to socialize medicine. He's getting up there in age, and he's chosen a VP without a whole lot of experience. But I think I can trust him to choose good advisers and I believe that Palin would maintain those advisers if she had to take over the presidency.
I do like McCain's plan for Iraq. And I do believe that even though McCain helped to write the economic bailout plan that eventually passed congress, he would work to restore free market banking.
Most importantly I believe in McCain's integrity. And that, more than anything else, is why I'm going to vote for him.
Hygge? Gemütlichkeit? Fondue!
6 years ago
7 comments:
I think the reasons you like McCain are just. Please, vote for him for those reasons.
I think your fear for Obama is based more on Republican attacks than fact. Guilt by association? Really? Remember the pastor of our church when you were a practicing Lutheran? Do you think he would stand up to presidential candidate vetting? Do you think your character should be judged by that?
Ayers supported Obama, not the other way around. I also believe it was wrong that Obama accepted that support, but I don't believe for a second that Obama shares the same beliefs with Ayers because of this.
I am shocked that you think Obama's charisma is a negative, but that's just an opinion. Comparing him to Hitler is the most unfair comparison I have heard in years. You know, as well as anyone, the many negative connotations that this comparison brings. The hatred of Hitler has nothing to do with his charisma. I am appalled that you would write such a thing in a public forum.
Please try to stay positive. Remember that the power of the president is fairly limited (although seems to be increasing at a ridiculous rate as of late). Instead of being scared, be hopeful. For you, it seems like hope lies in McCain. Hope he wins the election because you agree with his ideas and the way he wants to lead the country. A lot of people were really scared of Bush winning the last election. Do you feel their fears were just? I don't. Personally, I wish I picked a candidate I liked four years ago instead of supporting the opposite of what I feared. Just my opinion.
Brian, I do remember that pastor and I was very happy that it was easy to disassociate myself from him when we found out what he was up to. I would not defend him or his actions. I would note, however, that the immoral behavior of that particular person never came to the pulpit with him. Rev. Write has preached hatred and anti-Americanism from his pulpit.
When it comes to known terrorists, I do in fact believe in guilt by association. Sorry. Perhaps that's a "distraction" but I think you can tell a bit about a person's character by looking at their friends. If you're running in the same circles as a left wing terrorist, chances are you lean pretty gosh darn far to the left.
I do not consider Obama's charisma a negative. The point of the Hitler comment is that charisma can win people over to the worst possible of causes. It's no stretch to think that Obama's charisma has won him a loyal following he would not have if people looked solely at his platform and his personal character. I'm asking you to look beyond the charisma. This man associates with questionable people, supports questionable organizations, and has questionable loyalties. He's so far left he might as well admit he's a socialist and I question his commitment to the constitution.
Obama is saying what people think they want to hear but if you really listen, there isn't much substance behind it and if you really investigate some of his plans you may find them a bit hollow.
I'm scared because we're facing economic crisis. I'm scared because polls show Obama in the lead and I think Obama as president during an economic crisis would be a disaster. I'm scared because Obama doesn't seem to believe in free market economics. Michael Savage called Obama's economic policy "trickle up poverty". I think he's right and that frightens me.
Sara,
Not only is your original article well written and spot on, your rebuttal to ruhmann is equally compelling.
Really excellent stuff, here.
I find it interesting that you were excoriated for mentioning, in a "public forum," Hitler's charisma as being similar to Obama's in terms of duping the public into following him. Is ruhmann "appalled" that you see the connection, or simply afraid that the rest of us will read your post and say, "Holy Cow... she's right!"?
In either event, what could possibly be wrong about discussing the issue? Or, is this another topic that is offensive to someone and therefore out of bounds for the politically correct?
Cam, FYI, Ruhmann is my brother. I don't get too offended when he gets on my case. He's usually pretty smart. I can't figure out why he's a liberal though.
In his defense, I think he misunderstood the Hitler comments. I think he thought I was calling Obama Hitler or that I thought Obama's evils were in the same league with Hitler's. I most certainly do not. "Hitler" is pretty emotionally loaded and rightfully so. Perhaps I should have used David Koresh (the cult leader of Waco fame) or Charlie Manson as the example instead. Again, I don't think Obama is murderously evil like these folks, but I do think he has the same sort of charisma -- a hypnotic kind of charisma that wins even smart folks over to wrong headed views. But I was quoting my husband and my husband said "Hitler" so there it is.
I don't want to delete your comment. Can you please edit the cussing down a notch? I try to keep the place rated PG-13 at worst.
JFK and Clinton certainly fit the bill of charismatic leaders, no doubt. While they were both Democrats, neither of them pushed a Marxist agenda. In fact, neither of them pushed an agenda that made me even remotely as uncomfortable as Obama. You did hear him openly admit that his goal to "spread the wealth around", right? This is, without even a tiny little doubt, a Marxist ideal.
Couldn't figure out how to edit it, but this is what I would have changed it to:
"Other charismatic leaders:
JFK
Reagan
Bill Clinton
I'm happy that those people didn't turn out to be completely evil or we would all be in trouble. Am I right? We dodged some bullets with those guys."
Post a Comment